Monday 22 October 2012

Reasons Behind The Hesitation Of Lawyers In Accepting Auto Accident Insurance Related Cases

There are a number of reasons why not all lawyers would willingly accept taking on auto accident insurance claims cases. Refusal on the part of insurance companies to pay the insurance claims filed by victims of auto accidents would lead to such cases. Insurance companies sell these auto insurance policies to people with the guarantee of providing prompt payment or compensation in the event that they find themselves caught in the middle of an auto accident. Sadly, that isnt always the case. There are often disputes concerning facts about the case, leading most insurers to suspect that the facts of the accident are made up and they are simply out to defraud the insurance companies. Sometimes, it is the amount that becomes the issue. The insurance company thinks they are paying too much while the victims who are claiming payment feel as though they deserve more. These disputes become heated, so much so that the parties have to call in their respective lawyers and take their dispute to a more legal plane.

In most cases, insurance companies have their own legal department and own lawyers to sort out all their legal problems. It's different for the accident victims since they have to seek out their own legal representation. They are the ones who are most likely to encounter lawyers who are not too keen on taking up their case and representing them. Let us try to look at the reasons behind the refusal of these lawyers to accept the case and represent the victims in the auto accident insurance case.

The first reason most lawyers have for refusing taking on the cases that are related to auto accident insurance claims is because of the length of time involved in these cases. Naturally, lawyers would prefer it if they handle cases that are easier to resolve and would not take them considerably long periods of time.

Secondly, we have some lawyers who are unwilling to take up cases revolving around auto accident insurance claims because such cases pay little. The amount of compensation that will eventually be paid out by the insurance company would be the source of the payment to the lawyer, and often it is a mere percentage of the total amount. We are talking about auto accident insurance claims that aren't really much by general standards. So when the percentage is applied, the lawyer will end up with a truly miserable and minimal amount. Some lawyers in certain jurisdictions base their asking price for their legal fees on the number of hours they rendered service on that particular case. But that can often lead to situations where their fees end up being larger than the compensations paid out. That can in turn lead to ethical questions: because a lawyer charging a client more than he or she manages to secure for that client in terms of compensation is bound to raise eyebrows.

There is also another reason why many lawyers do not want to even get involved in cases on auto accident insurance claims: such cases can be quite draining. They can be quite draining because, in court, they are sure to face other lawyers who are intent on making sure the insurers would pay a minimal amount or none at all. Things become especially tricky when the insurers lawyers make the victims appear as though they fraudsters and their lawyers are ambulance chasers. Even out of court, the experience could also be draining, especially if the lawyers have to continually give unpleasant updates to their clients about the progress of the case.

Recommended links:
Auto Accident Lawyer Reno

No comments:

Post a Comment